Quick verdict

GPT-5.6 Terra or Claude Opus 5?

Choose GPT-5.6 Terra when balanced professional, coding and agent workloads is the closer match. Choose Claude Opus 5 when high-quality agents with a lower token price than fable matters more. Test both on the same real tasks before moving a production workflow.

Choose GPT-5.6 Terra for

Balanced professional, coding and agent workloads

Choose Claude Opus 5 for

High-quality agents with a lower token price than Fable

OpenAI · Model

GPT-5.6 Terra

GPT-5.6 model designed to balance intelligence and cost.

Official specification ↗
Anthropic · Model

Claude Opus 5

Anthropic model for complex agentic coding and professional work.

Official specification ↗
01

Side-by-side comparison

CategoryGPT-5.6 TerraClaude Opus 5
ProviderOpenAIAnthropic
TypeModel · Reasoning modelModel · Reasoning model
Pricing summary$2 input, $0.20 cached input and $12 output per 1M tokens$5 input, $0.50 cache read and $25 output per 1M tokens
Input price$2 / 1M tokens$5 / 1M tokens
Cached input$0.20 / 1M tokens$0.50 / 1M tokens
Output price$12 / 1M tokens$25 / 1M tokens
Context window1.05M tokens1M tokens
Maximum output128K tokens128K tokens
Knowledge cutoffFebruary 16, 2026May 2026
Reasoningnone, low, medium, high, xhigh, maxAdaptive; high default effort
Relative speedBalancedModerate; optional Fast mode at higher price
Input modalitiesText and imageText and image
Output modalitiesTextText
Tools and integrationsFunctions, web search, file search, computer use and supported Responses API toolsClaude API tool use, computer use and agent workflows
API / accessv1/responses, v1/chat/completions and v1/batchClaude Messages API
Best fitBalanced professional, coding and agent workloadsHigh-quality agents with a lower token price than Fable
CompanyOpenAIAnthropic
Product categoryModel · Reasoning modelModel · Reasoning model
Current pricing note$2 input, $0.20 cached input and $12 output per 1M tokens$5 input, $0.50 cache read and $25 output per 1M tokens
Best suited toBalanced professional, coding and agent workloadsHigh-quality agents with a lower token price than Fable
Key capabilities1.05M context; 128K maximum output; Vision input; Responses API toolsComplex agent work; Coding; Adaptive thinking; Optional Fast mode
Last verified2026-09-082026-09-08
Official product sourcehttps://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/gpt-5.6-terrahttps://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5
02

How we reached this verdict

We looked at the things that affect everyday use: what each product can do, how its plans are structured, where it fits into your existing workflow, and what the provider currently documents. Benchmark results are useful context, but they are not a universal winner score because test settings and tools vary.

03

Common questions

GPT-5.6 Terra or Claude Opus 5: which should I choose?

Choose GPT-5.6 Terra for balanced professional, coding and agent workloads. Choose Claude Opus 5 for high-quality agents with a lower token price than fable. Validate the decision with your own prompts and total task cost.

Is GPT-5.6 Terra cheaper than Claude Opus 5?

Pricing units can differ. GPT-5.6 Terra: $2 input, $0.20 cached input and $12 output per 1M tokens. Claude Opus 5: $5 input, $0.50 cache read and $25 output per 1M tokens. Check tool charges, plan limits, caching and long-context rules before comparing totals.

Which is better for coding and agent work?

Capability depends on the selected product surface, tools and harness. GPT-5.6 Terra is positioned for balanced professional, coding and agent workloads; Claude Opus 5 is positioned for high-quality agents with a lower token price than fable. Run the same repository task on both.

How do their context windows compare?

GPT-5.6 Terra lists 1.05M tokens; Claude Opus 5 lists 1M tokens. A larger limit does not by itself guarantee better retrieval or lower cost.

04

Official sources

Use these provider pages to confirm current features, pricing and availability.

AI tools change quickly. We checked this page on 2026-09-08. Before you subscribe, confirm the latest price, regional availability and usage limits on the provider website.