Quick verdict

GPT-5.6 Luna or Claude Sonnet 5.5?

Choose GPT-5.6 Luna when high-volume extraction, classification and routine agent tasks is the closer match. Choose Claude Sonnet 5.5 when full-stack software development, automated ui testing and production agent workflows matters more. Test both on the same real tasks before moving a production workflow.

Choose GPT-5.6 Luna for

High-volume extraction, classification and routine agent tasks

Choose Claude Sonnet 5.5 for

Full-stack software development, automated UI testing and production agent workflows

OpenAI · Model

GPT-5.6 Luna

GPT-5.6 model optimized for cost-sensitive, high-volume workloads.

Official specification ↗
Anthropic · Model

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Anthropic's workhorse model with enhanced computer use and sub-second token generation.

Official specification ↗
01

Side-by-side comparison

CategoryGPT-5.6 LunaClaude Sonnet 5.5
ProviderOpenAIAnthropic
TypeModel · Reasoning modelModel · Balanced reasoning model
Pricing summary$0.20 input, $0.02 cached input and $1.20 output per 1M tokens$2 input, $0.20 cache read and $10 output per 1M tokens
Input price$0.20 / 1M tokens$2 / 1M tokens
Cached input$0.02 / 1M tokens$0.20 / 1M tokens
Output price$1.20 / 1M tokens$10 / 1M tokens
Context window1.05M tokens500K tokens
Maximum output128K tokens128K tokens
Knowledge cutoffFebruary 16, 2026August 2026
Reasoningnone, low, medium, high, xhigh, maxAdaptive thinking with custom effort
Relative speedFast / cost optimizedHigh throughput
Input modalitiesText and imageText and image
Output modalitiesTextText
Tools and integrationsFunctions, web search, file search, computer use and supported Responses API toolsClaude API tool use, desktop computer use, Claude Code
API / accessv1/responses, v1/chat/completions and v1/batchClaude Messages API
Best fitHigh-volume extraction, classification and routine agent tasksFull-stack software development, automated UI testing and production agent workflows
CompanyOpenAIAnthropic
Product categoryModel · Reasoning modelModel · Balanced reasoning model
Current pricing note$0.20 input, $0.02 cached input and $1.20 output per 1M tokens$2 input, $0.20 cache read and $10 output per 1M tokens
Best suited toHigh-volume extraction, classification and routine agent tasksFull-stack software development, automated UI testing and production agent workflows
Key capabilities1.05M context; 128K maximum output; Vision input; Responses API toolsSub-second latency; Enhanced desktop computer use; 500K context; Claude Code default
Last verified2026-09-082026-10-15
Official product sourcehttps://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/gpt-5.6-lunahttps://platform.claude.com/docs/en/models/sonnet-5-5/overview
02

How we reached this verdict

We looked at the things that affect everyday use: what each product can do, how its plans are structured, where it fits into your existing workflow, and what the provider currently documents. Benchmark results are useful context, but they are not a universal winner score because test settings and tools vary.

03

Common questions

GPT-5.6 Luna or Claude Sonnet 5.5: which should I choose?

Choose GPT-5.6 Luna for high-volume extraction, classification and routine agent tasks. Choose Claude Sonnet 5.5 for full-stack software development, automated ui testing and production agent workflows. Validate the decision with your own prompts and total task cost.

Is GPT-5.6 Luna cheaper than Claude Sonnet 5.5?

Pricing units can differ. GPT-5.6 Luna: $0.20 input, $0.02 cached input and $1.20 output per 1M tokens. Claude Sonnet 5.5: $2 input, $0.20 cache read and $10 output per 1M tokens. Check tool charges, plan limits, caching and long-context rules before comparing totals.

Which is better for coding and agent work?

Capability depends on the selected product surface, tools and harness. GPT-5.6 Luna is positioned for high-volume extraction, classification and routine agent tasks; Claude Sonnet 5.5 is positioned for full-stack software development, automated ui testing and production agent workflows. Run the same repository task on both.

How do their context windows compare?

GPT-5.6 Luna lists 1.05M tokens; Claude Sonnet 5.5 lists 500K tokens. A larger limit does not by itself guarantee better retrieval or lower cost.

04

Official sources

Use these provider pages to confirm current features, pricing and availability.

AI tools change quickly. We checked this page on 2026-09-08. Before you subscribe, confirm the latest price, regional availability and usage limits on the provider website.